A comparative analysis of technical data: At-home vs. in-clinic application of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103
- Published
- 2025 Jul-Aug
- Container
- Brain stimulation
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103,
title = {A comparative analysis of technical data: At-home vs. in-clinic application of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression.},
author = {Vogelmann U and Stadler M and Soldini A and Chang KY and Chen M and Bulubas L and Dechantsreiter E and Plewnia C and Fallgatter A and Langguth B and Normann C and Frase L and Zwanzger P and Kammer T and Schönfeldt-Lecuona C and Kamp D and Bajbouj M and Hunold A and Schramm S and Priller J and Palm U and Charvet L and Keeser D and Burkhardt G and Padberg F},
year = {2025},
journal = {Brain stimulation},
doi = {10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparative analysis of technical data: At-home vs. in-clinic application of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression. AU - Vogelmann U AU - Stadler M AU - Soldini A AU - Chang KY AU - Chen M AU - Bulubas L AU - Dechantsreiter E AU - Plewnia C AU - Fallgatter A AU - Langguth B AU - Normann C AU - Frase L AU - Zwanzger P AU - Kammer T AU - Schönfeldt-Lecuona C AU - Kamp D AU - Bajbouj M AU - Hunold A AU - Schramm S AU - Priller J AU - Palm U AU - Charvet L AU - Keeser D AU - Burkhardt G AU - Padberg F PY - 2025 JO - Brain stimulation DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103 ER -
APA
U, V., M, S., A, S., KY, C., M, C., L, B., E, D., C, P., A, F., B, L., C, N., L, F., P, Z., T, K., C, S., D, K., M, B., A, H., S, S., J, P., U, P., L, C., D, K., G, B., & F, P. (2025). A comparative analysis of technical data: At-home vs. in-clinic application of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression.. Brain stimulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.05.103
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:29:39.168Z