Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019
- Published
- 2026 Jul 31
- Container
- Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019,
title = {Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Ye Z and Paredes XS and Diletti R and Testa L and Daemen J and de la Torre Hernandez JM and Dou K and Banning AP and Spitzer E},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions},
doi = {10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Ye Z AU - Paredes XS AU - Diletti R AU - Testa L AU - Daemen J AU - de la Torre Hernandez JM AU - Dou K AU - Banning AP AU - Spitzer E PY - 2026 JO - Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019 ER -
APA
Z, Y., XS, P., R, D., L, T., J, D., JM, D. L. T. H., K, D., AP, B., & E, S. (2026). Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.07.019
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:31:19.220Z