The CICM second part viva reliability coefficient: Which index, for which decision, against which benchmark?
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209
- Published
- 2026-08-26
- Container
- Crit Care Resusc
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209,
title = {The CICM second part viva reliability coefficient: Which index, for which decision, against which benchmark?},
author = {Bihari S and Allen SJ and Cartner MJ and Knudsen S and Austin D and Wesley S.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Crit Care Resusc},
doi = {10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The CICM second part viva reliability coefficient: Which index, for which decision, against which benchmark? AU - Bihari S AU - Allen SJ AU - Cartner MJ AU - Knudsen S AU - Austin D AU - Wesley S. PY - 2026 JO - Crit Care Resusc DO - 10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209 ER -
APA
S, B., SJ, A., MJ, C., S, K., D, A., & S., W. (2026). The CICM second part viva reliability coefficient: Which index, for which decision, against which benchmark?. Crit Care Resusc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100209
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:13:30.285Z