The glucose monitoring comparison in primary care study (GluCoCare): Study design, methods, recruitment success, and baseline characteristics of study participants.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357
- Published
- 2026 Jul
- Container
- Contemporary clinical trials
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357,
title = {The glucose monitoring comparison in primary care study (GluCoCare): Study design, methods, recruitment success, and baseline characteristics of study participants.},
author = {Martens TW and Asche SE and JaKa MM and Johnson ML and Dunnigan S and Haven AL and Morris C and Barnaby D and Maciosek MV and Dinh JM and Kaiser SJ and Trower NK and Gustafson SK and Leet K and Krizka SK and Zimmerman SH and Castellanos VG and Forrester KR and Bergenstal RM},
year = {2026},
journal = {Contemporary clinical trials},
doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The glucose monitoring comparison in primary care study (GluCoCare): Study design, methods, recruitment success, and baseline characteristics of study participants. AU - Martens TW AU - Asche SE AU - JaKa MM AU - Johnson ML AU - Dunnigan S AU - Haven AL AU - Morris C AU - Barnaby D AU - Maciosek MV AU - Dinh JM AU - Kaiser SJ AU - Trower NK AU - Gustafson SK AU - Leet K AU - Krizka SK AU - Zimmerman SH AU - Castellanos VG AU - Forrester KR AU - Bergenstal RM PY - 2026 JO - Contemporary clinical trials DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357 ER -
APA
TW, M., SE, A., MM, J., ML, J., S, D., AL, H., C, M., D, B., MV, M., JM, D., SJ, K., NK, T., SK, G., K, L., SK, K., SH, Z., VG, C., KR, F., & RM, B. (2026). The glucose monitoring comparison in primary care study (GluCoCare): Study design, methods, recruitment success, and baseline characteristics of study participants.. Contemporary clinical trials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108357
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:32:50.177Z