Triple-row technique reduces gap formation and elongation compared with the suture-bridge technique
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925
- Published
- 2026-10
- Container
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925,
title = {Triple-row technique reduces gap formation and elongation compared with the suture-bridge technique},
author = {Eiji Tashiro and Naoya Kozono and Akira Nabeshima and Yuta Sakemi and Hidehiko Higaki and Takeshi Shimoto and Erina Yamada and Yasuharu Nakashima},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical Biomechanics},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Triple-row technique reduces gap formation and elongation compared with the suture-bridge technique AU - Eiji Tashiro AU - Naoya Kozono AU - Akira Nabeshima AU - Yuta Sakemi AU - Hidehiko Higaki AU - Takeshi Shimoto AU - Erina Yamada AU - Yasuharu Nakashima PY - 2026 JO - Clinical Biomechanics DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925 ER -
APA
Tashiro, E., Kozono, N., Nabeshima, A., Sakemi, Y., Higaki, H., Shimoto, T., Yamada, E., & Nakashima, Y. (2026). Triple-row technique reduces gap formation and elongation compared with the suture-bridge technique. Clinical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106925
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:06:14.436Z