Biomechanical comparison of titanium cage versus three-dimensional-printed prosthesis for lumbar spinal tuberculosis reconstruction: a finite element analysis
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971
- Published
- 2027-01
- Container
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971,
title = {Biomechanical comparison of titanium cage versus three-dimensional-printed prosthesis for lumbar spinal tuberculosis reconstruction: a finite element analysis},
author = {Pengpeng Ma and Xin Zhang and Zhiguo Zong and Su Liu and Wei Li and Chunling Zhang},
year = {2027},
journal = {Clinical Biomechanics},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Biomechanical comparison of titanium cage versus three-dimensional-printed prosthesis for lumbar spinal tuberculosis reconstruction: a finite element analysis AU - Pengpeng Ma AU - Xin Zhang AU - Zhiguo Zong AU - Su Liu AU - Wei Li AU - Chunling Zhang PY - 2027 JO - Clinical Biomechanics DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971 ER -
APA
Ma, P., Zhang, X., Zong, Z., Liu, S., Li, W., & Zhang, C. (2027). Biomechanical comparison of titanium cage versus three-dimensional-printed prosthesis for lumbar spinal tuberculosis reconstruction: a finite element analysis. Clinical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106971
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-07T21:37:39.590Z