En bloc versus conventional resection of primary bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065
- Published
- 2026-01
- Container
- Clinics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065,
title = {En bloc versus conventional resection of primary bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
author = {Pietro Delgado Rezende and Adriana Sayuri Hashimoto and Henrique Lepine and José Pedro Cassemiro Micheleto and Mauricio Dener Cordeiro and José Maurício Mota and William Carlos Nahas and Mohamed Elkoushy and Walid Shahrour and Walid Shabana and Marian Severin Wettstein and Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho and Caio Vinicius Suartz},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinics},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - En bloc versus conventional resection of primary bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis AU - Pietro Delgado Rezende AU - Adriana Sayuri Hashimoto AU - Henrique Lepine AU - José Pedro Cassemiro Micheleto AU - Mauricio Dener Cordeiro AU - José Maurício Mota AU - William Carlos Nahas AU - Mohamed Elkoushy AU - Walid Shahrour AU - Walid Shabana AU - Marian Severin Wettstein AU - Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho AU - Caio Vinicius Suartz PY - 2026 JO - Clinics DO - 10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065 ER -
APA
Rezende, P. D., Hashimoto, A. S., Lepine, H., Micheleto, J. P. C., Cordeiro, M. D., Mota, J. M., Nahas, W. C., Elkoushy, M., Shahrour, W., Shabana, W., Wettstein, M. S., Ribeiro-Filho, L. A., & Suartz, C. V. (2026). En bloc versus conventional resection of primary bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101065
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:43:29.834Z