Aging vs. biological age: Conceptual considerations for age reversal claims.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015
- Published
- 2026 Sep 1
- Container
- Cell metabolism
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015,
title = {Aging vs. biological age: Conceptual considerations for age reversal claims.},
author = {Poganik JR and Moldakozhayev A and Justice JN and Kaeberlein M and Adams PD and Rockwood K and Ferrucci L and Gladyshev VN},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cell metabolism},
doi = {10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Aging vs. biological age: Conceptual considerations for age reversal claims. AU - Poganik JR AU - Moldakozhayev A AU - Justice JN AU - Kaeberlein M AU - Adams PD AU - Rockwood K AU - Ferrucci L AU - Gladyshev VN PY - 2026 JO - Cell metabolism DO - 10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015 ER -
APA
JR, P., A, M., JN, J., M, K., PD, A., K, R., L, F., & VN, G. (2026). Aging vs. biological age: Conceptual considerations for age reversal claims.. Cell metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2026.06.015
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:07:27.938Z