More trees, more moths: how urban treescapes can help reverse moth declines

Richard Fox, Tomas Roslin, Emilie E Ellis

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644
Published: 2026-10
Container: Current Opinion in Insect Science
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644,
  title = {More trees, more moths: how urban treescapes can help reverse moth declines},
  author = {Richard Fox and Tomas Roslin and Emilie E Ellis},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Current Opinion in Insect Science},
  doi = {10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - More trees, more moths: how urban treescapes can help reverse moth declines
AU  - Richard Fox
AU  - Tomas Roslin
AU  - Emilie E Ellis
PY  - 2026
JO  - Current Opinion in Insect Science
DO  - 10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644
ER  -

APA

Fox, R., Roslin, T., & Ellis, E. E. (2026). More trees, more moths: how urban treescapes can help reverse moth declines. Current Opinion in Insect Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2026.101644

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T14:00:39.270Z