Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970
- Published
- 2025 Sep
- Container
- Contraception
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970,
title = {Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial.},
author = {Esclassan F and Tank N and Switonski A and Steiner MJ and Hood S and Jaisamrarn U},
year = {2025},
journal = {Contraception},
doi = {10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial. AU - Esclassan F AU - Tank N AU - Switonski A AU - Steiner MJ AU - Hood S AU - Jaisamrarn U PY - 2025 JO - Contraception DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970 ER -
APA
F, E., N, T., A, S., MJ, S., S, H., & U, J. (2025). Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial.. Contraception. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110970
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T13:09:18.957Z