"Feminine" strengths, "masculine" costs: Rethinking gender gaps in negotiation research.

Townsend CH, Kray LJ

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452
Published
2026 Sep 7
Container
Current opinion in psychology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452,
  title = {"Feminine" strengths, "masculine" costs: Rethinking gender gaps in negotiation research.},
  author = {Townsend CH and Kray LJ},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Current opinion in psychology},
  doi = {10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - "Feminine" strengths, "masculine" costs: Rethinking gender gaps in negotiation research.
AU  - Townsend CH
AU  - Kray LJ
PY  - 2026
JO  - Current opinion in psychology
DO  - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452
ER  - 

APA

CH, T., & LJ, K. (2026). "Feminine" strengths, "masculine" costs: Rethinking gender gaps in negotiation research.. Current opinion in psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102452

Source records