A formal neuroradiology second opinion service changes management in one in five cases: a retrospective cohort study of discrepancies and types of errors.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462
- Published
- 2026 Aug 25
- Container
- Clinical radiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462,
title = {A formal neuroradiology second opinion service changes management in one in five cases: a retrospective cohort study of discrepancies and types of errors.},
author = {Abdelsalam N and Radon M and Mills S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical radiology},
doi = {10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A formal neuroradiology second opinion service changes management in one in five cases: a retrospective cohort study of discrepancies and types of errors. AU - Abdelsalam N AU - Radon M AU - Mills S PY - 2026 JO - Clinical radiology DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462 ER -
APA
N, A., M, R., & S, M. (2026). A formal neuroradiology second opinion service changes management in one in five cases: a retrospective cohort study of discrepancies and types of errors.. Clinical radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2026.107462
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:07:47.495Z