Dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison of lung SBRT using three different motion management strategies.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044
- Published
- 2026 Jan
- Container
- Clinical and translational radiation oncology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044,
title = {Dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison of lung SBRT using three different motion management strategies.},
author = {Lansing T and Harris W and Yu M and Cheema Z and He X and Fu Y and Lee SK and Cervino L and Li T and Li X and Moran J and Mueller B and Gelblum D and Berry S and Zhang H},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical and translational radiation oncology},
doi = {10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison of lung SBRT using three different motion management strategies. AU - Lansing T AU - Harris W AU - Yu M AU - Cheema Z AU - He X AU - Fu Y AU - Lee SK AU - Cervino L AU - Li T AU - Li X AU - Moran J AU - Mueller B AU - Gelblum D AU - Berry S AU - Zhang H PY - 2026 JO - Clinical and translational radiation oncology DO - 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044 ER -
APA
T, L., W, H., M, Y., Z, C., X, H., Y, F., SK, L., L, C., T, L., X, L., J, M., B, M., D, G., S, B., & H, Z. (2026). Dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison of lung SBRT using three different motion management strategies.. Clinical and translational radiation oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101044
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:31:10.061Z