Comparison of Uriswab to alternative methods for urine culture collection and transport: confirmation of standard culture methodology for investigation of urinary tract infections.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001
- Published
- 2016 Aug
- Container
- Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001,
title = {Comparison of Uriswab to alternative methods for urine culture collection and transport: confirmation of standard culture methodology for investigation of urinary tract infections.},
author = {Rennie RP and Turnbull LA and Gauchier-Pitts K and Bennett T and Dyrland D and Blonski S},
year = {2016},
journal = {Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease},
doi = {10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Uriswab to alternative methods for urine culture collection and transport: confirmation of standard culture methodology for investigation of urinary tract infections. AU - Rennie RP AU - Turnbull LA AU - Gauchier-Pitts K AU - Bennett T AU - Dyrland D AU - Blonski S PY - 2016 JO - Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001 ER -
APA
RP, R., LA, T., K, G., T, B., D, D., & S, B. (2016). Comparison of Uriswab to alternative methods for urine culture collection and transport: confirmation of standard culture methodology for investigation of urinary tract infections.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.001
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:10:32.849Z