The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: the case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015
- Published
- 2014 Sep
- Container
- The International journal on drug policy
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015,
title = {The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: the case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England.},
author = {Duke K and Thom B},
year = {2014},
journal = {The International journal on drug policy},
doi = {10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: the case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England. AU - Duke K AU - Thom B PY - 2014 JO - The International journal on drug policy DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015 ER -
APA
K, D., & B, T. (2014). The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: the case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England.. The International journal on drug policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:02:10.108Z