BirdNET and Perch perform poorly for species inventories in Amazonia but can provide a proxy for community turnover
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966
- Published
- 09
- Container
- Ecological Informatics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966,
title = {BirdNET and Perch perform poorly for species inventories in Amazonia but can provide a proxy for community turnover},
author = {Oliver C. Metcalf and Nárgila Gomes de Moura and W. Alexander Hopping and Cássio Alencar Nunes and Jos Barlow and Erika Berenguer and Liana Chesini Rossi and Alexander C. Lees},
year = {2026},
journal = {Ecological Informatics},
doi = {10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - BirdNET and Perch perform poorly for species inventories in Amazonia but can provide a proxy for community turnover AU - Oliver C. Metcalf AU - Nárgila Gomes de Moura AU - W. Alexander Hopping AU - Cássio Alencar Nunes AU - Jos Barlow AU - Erika Berenguer AU - Liana Chesini Rossi AU - Alexander C. Lees PY - 2026 JO - Ecological Informatics DO - 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966 ER -
APA
Metcalf, O. C., Moura, N. G. D., Hopping, W. A., Nunes, C. A., Barlow, J., Berenguer, E., Rossi, L. C., & Lees, A. C. (2026). BirdNET and Perch perform poorly for species inventories in Amazonia but can provide a proxy for community turnover. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103966
Source records
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:22:50.640Z