How good are rodent models of carcinogenesis in predicting efficacy in humans? A systematic review and meta-analysis of colon chemoprevention in rats, mice and men.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006
- Published
- 2005 Sep
- Container
- European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006,
title = {How good are rodent models of carcinogenesis in predicting efficacy in humans? A systematic review and meta-analysis of colon chemoprevention in rats, mice and men.},
author = {Corpet DE and Pierre F},
year = {2005},
journal = {European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How good are rodent models of carcinogenesis in predicting efficacy in humans? A systematic review and meta-analysis of colon chemoprevention in rats, mice and men. AU - Corpet DE AU - Pierre F PY - 2005 JO - European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006 ER -
APA
DE, C., & F, P. (2005). How good are rodent models of carcinogenesis in predicting efficacy in humans? A systematic review and meta-analysis of colon chemoprevention in rats, mice and men.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.006
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T22:27:50.252Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-24T22:27:50.264Z
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-24T22:27:50.295Z