Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review.

Romo-Miguel P, Ballesteros-Peña S

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003
Published
2024 Oct-Dec
Container
Enfermeria intensiva
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003,
  title = {Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review.},
  author = {Romo-Miguel P and Ballesteros-Peña S},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Enfermeria intensiva},
  doi = {10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review.
AU  - Romo-Miguel P
AU  - Ballesteros-Peña S
PY  - 2024
JO  - Enfermeria intensiva
DO  - 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003
ER  - 

APA

P, R., & S, B. (2024). Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review.. Enfermeria intensiva. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2023.10.003

Source records