Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer: efficacy and toxicity differ by outcome measure.

You J, You J, Xu B, Zhou Z

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602
Published
2026 Oct 20
Container
ESMO open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602,
  title = {Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer: efficacy and toxicity differ by outcome measure.},
  author = {You J and You J and Xu B and Zhou Z},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {ESMO open},
  doi = {10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer: efficacy and toxicity differ by outcome measure.
AU  - You J
AU  - You J
AU  - Xu B
AU  - Zhou Z
PY  - 2026
JO  - ESMO open
DO  - 10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602
ER  - 

APA

J, Y., J, Y., B, X., & Z, Z. (2026). Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer: efficacy and toxicity differ by outcome measure.. ESMO open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108602

Source records