FGFR3 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: An Expert Commentary on Best Practices From Patient Identification to Result Reporting.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003
- Published
- 2026 Aug
- Container
- European urology oncology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003,
title = {FGFR3 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: An Expert Commentary on Best Practices From Patient Identification to Result Reporting.},
author = {Compérat EM and Hartmann A and Allory Y and Bellosillo B and Caetano Moreira Oliveira RP and Chiappetta C and Hodeib F and Hubank M and Klümper N and Loriot Y and Penault-Llorca F and Rijken A and Speel EM and Szabados B and Bempt IV and Van Leenders GJLH and Vescovo M and Eckstein M},
year = {2026},
journal = {European urology oncology},
doi = {10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - FGFR3 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: An Expert Commentary on Best Practices From Patient Identification to Result Reporting. AU - Compérat EM AU - Hartmann A AU - Allory Y AU - Bellosillo B AU - Caetano Moreira Oliveira RP AU - Chiappetta C AU - Hodeib F AU - Hubank M AU - Klümper N AU - Loriot Y AU - Penault-Llorca F AU - Rijken A AU - Speel EM AU - Szabados B AU - Bempt IV AU - Van Leenders GJLH AU - Vescovo M AU - Eckstein M PY - 2026 JO - European urology oncology DO - 10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003 ER -
APA
EM, C., A, H., Y, A., B, B., RP, C. M. O., C, C., F, H., M, H., N, K., Y, L., F, P., A, R., EM, S., B, S., IV, B., GJLH, V. L., M, V., & M, E. (2026). FGFR3 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: An Expert Commentary on Best Practices From Patient Identification to Result Reporting.. European urology oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.06.003
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:24:15.380Z