Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013
- Published
- 2022-03
- Container
- European Urology Open Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013,
title = {Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis},
author = {Dinah K. Rindorf and Thomas Tailly and Guido M. Kamphuis and Sara Larsen and Bhaskar K. Somani and Olivier Traxer and Kevin Koo},
year = {2022},
journal = {European Urology Open Science},
doi = {10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis AU - Dinah K. Rindorf AU - Thomas Tailly AU - Guido M. Kamphuis AU - Sara Larsen AU - Bhaskar K. Somani AU - Olivier Traxer AU - Kevin Koo PY - 2022 JO - European Urology Open Science DO - 10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013 ER -
APA
Rindorf, D. K., Tailly, T., Kamphuis, G. M., Larsen, S., Somani, B. K., Traxer, O., & Koo, K. (2022). Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.013
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:29:23.076Z