Strategies used throughout the scaling-up process of eConsult - Multiple case study of four Canadian Provinces.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329
- Published
- 2023-06-08
- Container
- Eval Program Plann
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329,
title = {Strategies used throughout the scaling-up process of eConsult - Multiple case study of four Canadian Provinces.},
author = {Breton M and Smithman MA and Lamoureux-Lamarche C and Keely E and Farrell G and Singer A and Dumas Pilon M and Bush PL and Nabelsi V and Gaboury I and Gagnon MP and Steele Gray C and Hudon C and Aubrey-Bassler K and Visca R and Côté-Boileau É and Gagnon J and Deslauriers V and Liddy C.},
year = {2023},
journal = {Eval Program Plann},
doi = {10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Strategies used throughout the scaling-up process of eConsult - Multiple case study of four Canadian Provinces. AU - Breton M AU - Smithman MA AU - Lamoureux-Lamarche C AU - Keely E AU - Farrell G AU - Singer A AU - Dumas Pilon M AU - Bush PL AU - Nabelsi V AU - Gaboury I AU - Gagnon MP AU - Steele Gray C AU - Hudon C AU - Aubrey-Bassler K AU - Visca R AU - Côté-Boileau É AU - Gagnon J AU - Deslauriers V AU - Liddy C. PY - 2023 JO - Eval Program Plann DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329 ER -
APA
M, B., MA, S., C, L., E, K., G, F., A, S., M, D. P., PL, B., V, N., I, G., MP, G., C, S. G., C, H., K, A., R, V., É, C., J, G., V, D., & C., L. (2023). Strategies used throughout the scaling-up process of eConsult - Multiple case study of four Canadian Provinces.. Eval Program Plann. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102329
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:06:02.185Z