The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039
- Published
- 2026 Jun
- Container
- Fertility and sterility
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039,
title = {The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review.},
author = {Ganci D and Steeper M and Polyakov A and Sunkara SK and Wilkinson J and Lensen S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Fertility and sterility},
doi = {10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review. AU - Ganci D AU - Steeper M AU - Polyakov A AU - Sunkara SK AU - Wilkinson J AU - Lensen S PY - 2026 JO - Fertility and sterility DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039 ER -
APA
D, G., M, S., A, P., SK, S., J, W., & S, L. (2026). The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review.. Fertility and sterility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.03.039
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:00:52.961Z