Developmental-envelope screening and genome-annotation audit prioritize chemical authenticity candidates in commercial <i>Rubus chingii</i> fruit.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635
- Published
- 2026-10-16
- Container
- Food Chem X
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635,
title = {Developmental-envelope screening and genome-annotation audit prioritize chemical authenticity candidates in commercial \<i\>Rubus chingii\</i\> fruit.},
author = {Duan W and Wei Z and Gao W and Peng L.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Food Chem X},
doi = {10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Developmental-envelope screening and genome-annotation audit prioritize chemical authenticity candidates in commercial <i>Rubus chingii</i> fruit. AU - Duan W AU - Wei Z AU - Gao W AU - Peng L. PY - 2026 JO - Food Chem X DO - 10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635 ER -
APA
W, D., Z, W., W, G., & L., P. (2026). Developmental-envelope screening and genome-annotation audit prioritize chemical authenticity candidates in commercial <i>Rubus chingii</i> fruit.. Food Chem X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104635
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:03:01.286Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:03:01.284Z