Patient reported outcome measures in ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874
- Published
- 2022 May
- Container
- Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874,
title = {Patient reported outcome measures in ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review.},
author = {Gajebasia S and Jennison T and Blackstone J and Zaidi R and Muller P and Goldberg A},
year = {2022},
journal = {Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)},
doi = {10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Patient reported outcome measures in ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review. AU - Gajebasia S AU - Jennison T AU - Blackstone J AU - Zaidi R AU - Muller P AU - Goldberg A PY - 2022 JO - Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) DO - 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874 ER -
APA
S, G., T, J., J, B., R, Z., P, M., & A, G. (2022). Patient reported outcome measures in ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review.. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2021.101874
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:47:43.441Z