Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners".
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591
- Published
- 2025 Nov
- Container
- Forensic science international
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591,
title = {Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners".},
author = {Hicklin RA and Richetelli N and Taylor M and Emerick BL and Thompson RM},
year = {2025},
journal = {Forensic science international},
doi = {10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners". AU - Hicklin RA AU - Richetelli N AU - Taylor M AU - Emerick BL AU - Thompson RM PY - 2025 JO - Forensic science international DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591 ER -
APA
RA, H., N, R., M, T., BL, E., & RM, T. (2025). Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners".. Forensic science international. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112591
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:28:06.237Z