[Editorial biases in scientific publications and qualitative research: is there a place for positive discrimination?].
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Gaceta sanitaria
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348,
title = {[Editorial biases in scientific publications and qualitative research: is there a place for positive discrimination?].},
author = {Nogueira González P and Marcos Marcos J},
year = {2023},
journal = {Gaceta sanitaria},
doi = {10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - [Editorial biases in scientific publications and qualitative research: is there a place for positive discrimination?]. AU - Nogueira González P AU - Marcos Marcos J PY - 2023 JO - Gaceta sanitaria DO - 10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348 ER -
APA
P, N. G., & J, M. M. (2023). [Editorial biases in scientific publications and qualitative research: is there a place for positive discrimination?].. Gaceta sanitaria. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102348
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T08:38:00.626Z