Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Gait & posture
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249,
title = {Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.},
author = {Xie YJ and Song MS and Ma XD and Chen KX and Xie H and Li K and Dou ZL},
year = {2026},
journal = {Gait \& posture},
doi = {10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial. AU - Xie YJ AU - Song MS AU - Ma XD AU - Chen KX AU - Xie H AU - Li K AU - Dou ZL PY - 2026 JO - Gait & posture DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249 ER -
APA
YJ, X., MS, S., XD, M., KX, C., H, X., K, L., & ZL, D. (2026). Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.. Gait & posture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110249
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:18:27.513Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:18:27.499Z