Exploring running classifications using foot inclination angle and ground reaction force clustering methods: Do traditional foot strike categories capture meaningful patterns in ground reactions forces?
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661
- Published
- 2026 Oct 6
- Container
- Gait & posture
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661,
title = {Exploring running classifications using foot inclination angle and ground reaction force clustering methods: Do traditional foot strike categories capture meaningful patterns in ground reactions forces?},
author = {Vannatta CN and Tara VK and Kernozek TW},
year = {2026},
journal = {Gait \& posture},
doi = {10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Exploring running classifications using foot inclination angle and ground reaction force clustering methods: Do traditional foot strike categories capture meaningful patterns in ground reactions forces? AU - Vannatta CN AU - Tara VK AU - Kernozek TW PY - 2026 JO - Gait & posture DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661 ER -
APA
CN, V., VK, T., & TW, K. (2026). Exploring running classifications using foot inclination angle and ground reaction force clustering methods: Do traditional foot strike categories capture meaningful patterns in ground reactions forces?. Gait & posture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110661
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T12:41:26.230Z