The “4 per 1000” initiative: A credibility issue for the soil science community?

Philippe Baveye, Jacques Berthelin, Daniel Tessier, Gilles Lemaire

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005
Published: 2018
Container: Geoderma
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005,
  title = {The “4 per 1000” initiative: A credibility issue for the soil science community?},
  author = {Philippe Baveye and Jacques Berthelin and Daniel Tessier and Gilles Lemaire},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Geoderma},
  doi = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The “4 per 1000” initiative: A credibility issue for the soil science community?
AU  - Philippe Baveye
AU  - Jacques Berthelin
AU  - Daniel Tessier
AU  - Gilles Lemaire
PY  - 2018
JO  - Geoderma
DO  - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005
ER  -

APA

Baveye, P., Berthelin, J., Tessier, D., & Lemaire, G. (2018). The “4 per 1000” initiative: A credibility issue for the soil science community?. Geoderma. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005

Source records

hal · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:47:47.162Z