Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364
- Published
- 2022 Dec
- Container
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364,
title = {Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.},
author = {Wirestam R and Lundberg A and Chakwizira A and van Westen D and Knutsson L and Lind E},
year = {2022},
journal = {Heliyon},
doi = {10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging. AU - Wirestam R AU - Lundberg A AU - Chakwizira A AU - van Westen D AU - Knutsson L AU - Lind E PY - 2022 JO - Heliyon DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364 ER -
APA
R, W., A, L., A, C., D, V. W., L, K., & E, L. (2022). Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12364
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:29:07.025Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:29:07.036Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:29:07.041Z