Reply to the Editor-Detection yield, not positive predictive value, is the relevant metric for screening claims.

Pfeifer JM, Haggerty CM, Fornwalt BK

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027
Published
2026 Aug 27
Container
Heart rhythm
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027,
  title = {Reply to the Editor-Detection yield, not positive predictive value, is the relevant metric for screening claims.},
  author = {Pfeifer JM and Haggerty CM and Fornwalt BK},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Heart rhythm},
  doi = {10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to the Editor-Detection yield, not positive predictive value, is the relevant metric for screening claims.
AU  - Pfeifer JM
AU  - Haggerty CM
AU  - Fornwalt BK
PY  - 2026
JO  - Heart rhythm
DO  - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027
ER  - 

APA

JM, P., CM, H., & BK, F. (2026). Reply to the Editor-Detection yield, not positive predictive value, is the relevant metric for screening claims.. Heart rhythm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.08.027

Source records