PulseSelect vs FARAPULSE pulsed field ablation: Comparative analysis of myocardial, neural-injury and hemolysis biomarkers and short-term outcomes.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957
- Published
- 2026 Aug
- Container
- International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957,
title = {PulseSelect vs FARAPULSE pulsed field ablation: Comparative analysis of myocardial, neural-injury and hemolysis biomarkers and short-term outcomes.},
author = {Gold C and Falagkari A and Post F and Johnson V and Roth E and Kühn SJ and Linz D and Dobrev D and Erath-Honold J and Rottner L and Leistner DM and Kupusovic J and Wakili R},
year = {2026},
journal = {International journal of cardiology. Heart \& vasculature},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - PulseSelect vs FARAPULSE pulsed field ablation: Comparative analysis of myocardial, neural-injury and hemolysis biomarkers and short-term outcomes. AU - Gold C AU - Falagkari A AU - Post F AU - Johnson V AU - Roth E AU - Kühn SJ AU - Linz D AU - Dobrev D AU - Erath-Honold J AU - Rottner L AU - Leistner DM AU - Kupusovic J AU - Wakili R PY - 2026 JO - International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957 ER -
APA
C, G., A, F., F, P., V, J., E, R., SJ, K., D, L., D, D., J, E., L, R., DM, L., J, K., & R, W. (2026). PulseSelect vs FARAPULSE pulsed field ablation: Comparative analysis of myocardial, neural-injury and hemolysis biomarkers and short-term outcomes.. International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101957
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:33:36.404Z