A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023
- Published
- 2014-04-29
- Container
- Int J Gynaecol Obstet
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023,
title = {A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery.},
author = {Masood SN and Masood Y and Naim U and Masood MF.},
year = {2014},
journal = {Int J Gynaecol Obstet},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery. AU - Masood SN AU - Masood Y AU - Naim U AU - Masood MF. PY - 2014 JO - Int J Gynaecol Obstet DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023 ER -
APA
SN, M., Y, M., U, N., & MF., M. (2014). A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery.. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:39:53.437Z