Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091
- Published
- 2023 Jul
- Container
- International journal of medical informatics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091,
title = {Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability.},
author = {Marcilly R and Zheng WY and Quindroit P and Pelayo S and Berdot S and Charpiat B and Corny J and Drouot S and Frery P and Leguelinel-Blache G and Mondet L and Potier A and Robert L and Ferret L and Baysari M},
year = {2023},
journal = {International journal of medical informatics},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability. AU - Marcilly R AU - Zheng WY AU - Quindroit P AU - Pelayo S AU - Berdot S AU - Charpiat B AU - Corny J AU - Drouot S AU - Frery P AU - Leguelinel-Blache G AU - Mondet L AU - Potier A AU - Robert L AU - Ferret L AU - Baysari M PY - 2023 JO - International journal of medical informatics DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091 ER -
APA
R, M., WY, Z., P, Q., S, P., S, B., B, C., J, C., S, D., P, F., G, L., L, M., A, P., L, R., L, F., & M, B. (2023). Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability.. International journal of medical informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:24:31.045Z