Large language models as second reviewers for medical errors in real-world internal medicine reports: a prospective comparative study of open- and closed-source models.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316
- Published
- 2026 May
- Container
- International journal of medical informatics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316,
title = {Large language models as second reviewers for medical errors in real-world internal medicine reports: a prospective comparative study of open- and closed-source models.},
author = {Skrabic R and Viculin I and Boban Z and Kumric M and Vilovic M and Vrdoljak J and Bozic J},
year = {2026},
journal = {International journal of medical informatics},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Large language models as second reviewers for medical errors in real-world internal medicine reports: a prospective comparative study of open- and closed-source models. AU - Skrabic R AU - Viculin I AU - Boban Z AU - Kumric M AU - Vilovic M AU - Vrdoljak J AU - Bozic J PY - 2026 JO - International journal of medical informatics DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316 ER -
APA
R, S., I, V., Z, B., M, K., M, V., J, V., & J, B. (2026). Large language models as second reviewers for medical errors in real-world internal medicine reports: a prospective comparative study of open- and closed-source models.. International journal of medical informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106316
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:00:40.948Z