Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Infection prevention in practice
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561,
title = {Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.},
author = {Lam SC and Yu ITS and O'Donoghue M and Leung KK and Chong ACY and Sung LLK and Odetayo A and Suen LKP},
year = {2026},
journal = {Infection prevention in practice},
doi = {10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol. AU - Lam SC AU - Yu ITS AU - O'Donoghue M AU - Leung KK AU - Chong ACY AU - Sung LLK AU - Odetayo A AU - Suen LKP PY - 2026 JO - Infection prevention in practice DO - 10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561 ER -
APA
SC, L., ITS, Y., M, O., KK, L., ACY, C., LLK, S., A, O., & LKP, S. (2026). Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.. Infection prevention in practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:19:30.597Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:19:30.576Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:19:30.566Z