Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.

Lam SC, Yu ITS, O'Donoghue M, Leung KK, Chong ACY, Sung LLK, Odetayo A, Suen LKP

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561
Published
2026 Sep
Container
Infection prevention in practice
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561,
  title = {Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.},
  author = {Lam SC and Yu ITS and O'Donoghue M and Leung KK and Chong ACY and Sung LLK and Odetayo A and Suen LKP},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Infection prevention in practice},
  doi = {10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.
AU  - Lam SC
AU  - Yu ITS
AU  - O'Donoghue M
AU  - Leung KK
AU  - Chong ACY
AU  - Sung LLK
AU  - Odetayo A
AU  - Suen LKP
PY  - 2026
JO  - Infection prevention in practice
DO  - 10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561
ER  - 

APA

SC, L., ITS, Y., M, O., KK, L., ACY, C., LLK, S., A, O., & LKP, S. (2026). Evaluation of new and conventional N95 fit-testing protocols on equivalence and reproducibility: a study protocol.. Infection prevention in practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100561

Source records