Cyclosporine or methotrexate, which one is more promising in the treatment of lichen planopilaris?; A comparative clinical trial
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765
- Published
- 2020-09
- Container
- International Immunopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765,
title = {Cyclosporine or methotrexate, which one is more promising in the treatment of lichen planopilaris?; A comparative clinical trial},
author = {Farahnaz Fatemi Naeini and Fatemeh Mohaghegh and Minoo Jelvan and Ali Asilian and Mina Saber},
year = {2020},
journal = {International Immunopharmacology},
doi = {10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cyclosporine or methotrexate, which one is more promising in the treatment of lichen planopilaris?; A comparative clinical trial AU - Farahnaz Fatemi Naeini AU - Fatemeh Mohaghegh AU - Minoo Jelvan AU - Ali Asilian AU - Mina Saber PY - 2020 JO - International Immunopharmacology DO - 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765 ER -
APA
Naeini, F. F., Mohaghegh, F., Jelvan, M., Asilian, A., & Saber, M. (2020). Cyclosporine or methotrexate, which one is more promising in the treatment of lichen planopilaris?; A comparative clinical trial. International Immunopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T09:05:12.530Z