Early Intervention vs Conservative Management in Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Critical Review of Randomized Evidence.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178
- Published
- 2025 Oct
- Container
- JACC. Advances
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178,
title = {Early Intervention vs Conservative Management in Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Critical Review of Randomized Evidence.},
author = {Dayan V and Marin-Cuartas M and De Caterina R and De Waha S and Van Mieghem NM and Borger MA and Bonow RO and Bhatt DL},
year = {2025},
journal = {JACC. Advances},
doi = {10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Early Intervention vs Conservative Management in Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Critical Review of Randomized Evidence. AU - Dayan V AU - Marin-Cuartas M AU - De Caterina R AU - De Waha S AU - Van Mieghem NM AU - Borger MA AU - Bonow RO AU - Bhatt DL PY - 2025 JO - JACC. Advances DO - 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178 ER -
APA
V, D., M, M., R, D. C., S, D. W., NM, V. M., MA, B., RO, B., & DL, B. (2025). Early Intervention vs Conservative Management in Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Critical Review of Randomized Evidence.. JACC. Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102178
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:14:33.030Z