PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease

Kelton F. Reynolds, Jay Ramsay, Jimmy L. Kerrigan, Sasan R. Raissi

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214
Published
2026-09
Container
JACC: Case Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214,
  title = {PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease},
  author = {Kelton F. Reynolds and Jay Ramsay and Jimmy L. Kerrigan and Sasan R. Raissi},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {JACC: Case Reports},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease
AU  - Kelton F. Reynolds
AU  - Jay Ramsay
AU  - Jimmy L. Kerrigan
AU  - Sasan R. Raissi
PY  - 2026
JO  - JACC: Case Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214
ER  - 

APA

Reynolds, K. F., Ramsay, J., Kerrigan, J. L., & Raissi, S. R. (2026). PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease. JACC: Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214

Source records