PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214
- Published
- 2026-09
- Container
- JACC: Case Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214,
title = {PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease},
author = {Kelton F. Reynolds and Jay Ramsay and Jimmy L. Kerrigan and Sasan R. Raissi},
year = {2026},
journal = {JACC: Case Reports},
doi = {10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease AU - Kelton F. Reynolds AU - Jay Ramsay AU - Jimmy L. Kerrigan AU - Sasan R. Raissi PY - 2026 JO - JACC: Case Reports DO - 10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214 ER -
APA
Reynolds, K. F., Ramsay, J., Kerrigan, J. L., & Raissi, S. R. (2026). PET Versus Invasive Provocation Testing Accuracy for Coronary Microvascular Disease. JACC: Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.110214
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T13:20:00.584Z