Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035
- Published
- 2026 Jul 31
- Container
- Journal of clinical lipidology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035,
title = {Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.},
author = {Nakajima K and Murakami M and Tanaka A},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of clinical lipidology},
doi = {10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial. AU - Nakajima K AU - Murakami M AU - Tanaka A PY - 2026 JO - Journal of clinical lipidology DO - 10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035 ER -
APA
K, N., M, M., & A, T. (2026). Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.. Journal of clinical lipidology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:44:08.886Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:44:08.873Z