Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.

Nakajima K, Murakami M, Tanaka A

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035
Published
2026 Jul 31
Container
Journal of clinical lipidology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035,
  title = {Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.},
  author = {Nakajima K and Murakami M and Tanaka A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of clinical lipidology},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.
AU  - Nakajima K
AU  - Murakami M
AU  - Tanaka A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of clinical lipidology
DO  - 10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035
ER  - 

APA

K, N., M, M., & A, T. (2026). Discordance between remnant cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol obscures interpretation of the results of the PROMINENT trial.. Journal of clinical lipidology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.07.035

Source records