Efficacy of 5 × 5 accelerated versus conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345
- Published
- 2026 Jun 15
- Container
- Journal of affective disorders
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345,
title = {Efficacy of 5 × 5 accelerated versus conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression.},
author = {Apostol MR and Valles TE and Corlier J and Leuchter MK and Young AS and Artin H and Koek RJ and Einstein EH and Wilke SA and Oughli HA and Strouse T and Slan A and Distler MG and DeYoung DZ and Ginder N and Krantz DE and Leuchter AF},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of affective disorders},
doi = {10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Efficacy of 5 × 5 accelerated versus conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression. AU - Apostol MR AU - Valles TE AU - Corlier J AU - Leuchter MK AU - Young AS AU - Artin H AU - Koek RJ AU - Einstein EH AU - Wilke SA AU - Oughli HA AU - Strouse T AU - Slan A AU - Distler MG AU - DeYoung DZ AU - Ginder N AU - Krantz DE AU - Leuchter AF PY - 2026 JO - Journal of affective disorders DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345 ER -
APA
MR, A., TE, V., J, C., MK, L., AS, Y., H, A., RJ, K., EH, E., SA, W., HA, O., T, S., A, S., MG, D., DZ, D., N, G., DE, K., & AF, L. (2026). Efficacy of 5 × 5 accelerated versus conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression.. Journal of affective disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121345
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:53:58.186Z