Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005
- Published
- 2020-04
- Container
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005,
title = {Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially},
author = {Andreas Lundh and Kristine Rasmussen and Lasse Østengaard and Isabelle Boutron and Lesley A. Stewart and Asbjørn Hróbjartsson},
year = {2020},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially AU - Andreas Lundh AU - Kristine Rasmussen AU - Lasse Østengaard AU - Isabelle Boutron AU - Lesley A. Stewart AU - Asbjørn Hróbjartsson PY - 2020 JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005 ER -
APA
Lundh, A., Rasmussen, K., Østengaard, L., Boutron, I., Stewart, L. A., & Hróbjartsson, A. (2020). Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:10:56.169Z