A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyze longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study

Rosie A. Harris, Jessica Harris, Eric Lim, Chris A. Rogers

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400
Published
2026-10
Container
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400,
  title = {A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyze longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study},
  author = {Rosie A. Harris and Jessica Harris and Eric Lim and Chris A. Rogers},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyze longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study
AU  - Rosie A. Harris
AU  - Jessica Harris
AU  - Eric Lim
AU  - Chris A. Rogers
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
DO  - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400
ER  - 

APA

Harris, R. A., Harris, J., Lim, E., & Rogers, C. A. (2026). A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyze longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomized controlled trials: a simulation study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112400

Source records