Reporting of external validation studies needs improvement: a systematic review of reporting in oncology prediction model studies.

Whittle R, Legha A, Tsegaye B, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Archer L, Hudda MT, Riley RD, Dhiman P, Collins GS

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460
Published
2026 Aug 11
Container
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460,
  title = {Reporting of external validation studies needs improvement: a systematic review of reporting in oncology prediction model studies.},
  author = {Whittle R and Legha A and Tsegaye B and Ensor J and Snell KIE and Archer L and Hudda MT and Riley RD and Dhiman P and Collins GS},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reporting of external validation studies needs improvement: a systematic review of reporting in oncology prediction model studies.
AU  - Whittle R
AU  - Legha A
AU  - Tsegaye B
AU  - Ensor J
AU  - Snell KIE
AU  - Archer L
AU  - Hudda MT
AU  - Riley RD
AU  - Dhiman P
AU  - Collins GS
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of clinical epidemiology
DO  - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460
ER  - 

APA

R, W., A, L., B, T., J, E., KIE, S., L, A., MT, H., RD, R., P, D., & GS, C. (2026). Reporting of external validation studies needs improvement: a systematic review of reporting in oncology prediction model studies.. Journal of clinical epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112460

Source records