Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663
- Published
- 2025 May
- Container
- Journal of dentistry
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663,
title = {Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years.},
author = {Schenke IM and Pfister JL and Hiller KA and Buchalla W and Cieplik F and Ettenberger S and Scholz KJ and Federlin M},
year = {2025},
journal = {Journal of dentistry},
doi = {10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years. AU - Schenke IM AU - Pfister JL AU - Hiller KA AU - Buchalla W AU - Cieplik F AU - Ettenberger S AU - Scholz KJ AU - Federlin M PY - 2025 JO - Journal of dentistry DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663 ER -
APA
IM, S., JL, P., KA, H., W, B., F, C., S, E., KJ, S., & M, F. (2025). Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years.. Journal of dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:23:44.461Z