Comparative performance of ReMELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and established scores after TIPS for refractory ascites: A multicenter study.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795
- Published
- 2026-02-21
- Container
- JHEP Rep
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795,
title = {Comparative performance of ReMELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and established scores after TIPS for refractory ascites: A multicenter study.},
author = {Kimmann M and Farouk N and Bettinger D and Chang J and Kloeckner R and Ripoll C and Piecha F and Rashidi-Alavijeh J and Stadtmann J and Mousa AS and Bruns T and Engelmann C and Maasoumy B and Labenz C and Sturm L and Heinzow H and Seifert LL and Köhler M and Masthoff M and Kluwe J and Zipprich A and Jansen C and Meyer C and Schultheiss M and Trebicka J and Praktiknjo M and German Cirrhosis Study Group.},
year = {2026},
journal = {JHEP Rep},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative performance of ReMELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and established scores after TIPS for refractory ascites: A multicenter study. AU - Kimmann M AU - Farouk N AU - Bettinger D AU - Chang J AU - Kloeckner R AU - Ripoll C AU - Piecha F AU - Rashidi-Alavijeh J AU - Stadtmann J AU - Mousa AS AU - Bruns T AU - Engelmann C AU - Maasoumy B AU - Labenz C AU - Sturm L AU - Heinzow H AU - Seifert LL AU - Köhler M AU - Masthoff M AU - Kluwe J AU - Zipprich A AU - Jansen C AU - Meyer C AU - Schultheiss M AU - Trebicka J AU - Praktiknjo M AU - German Cirrhosis Study Group. PY - 2026 JO - JHEP Rep DO - 10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795 ER -
APA
M, K., N, F., D, B., J, C., R, K., C, R., F, P., J, R., J, S., AS, M., T, B., C, E., B, M., C, L., L, S., H, H., LL, S., M, K., M, M., J, K., A, Z., C, J., C, M., M, S., J, T., M, P., & Group., G. C. S. (2026). Comparative performance of ReMELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and established scores after TIPS for refractory ascites: A multicenter study.. JHEP Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101795
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:56:50.782Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:56:50.797Z