Gynecologic Surgeon Assessment of the Reprocessed Versus New LigaSure Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device in a Simulated Surgical Task: A Pilot Study.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044
- Published
- 2026 Jul
- Container
- Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044,
title = {Gynecologic Surgeon Assessment of the Reprocessed Versus New LigaSure Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device in a Simulated Surgical Task: A Pilot Study.},
author = {Swain CA and Garg B and Ecker A and Gould CH and Wong JMK},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of minimally invasive gynecology},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Gynecologic Surgeon Assessment of the Reprocessed Versus New LigaSure Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device in a Simulated Surgical Task: A Pilot Study. AU - Swain CA AU - Garg B AU - Ecker A AU - Gould CH AU - Wong JMK PY - 2026 JO - Journal of minimally invasive gynecology DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044 ER -
APA
CA, S., B, G., A, E., CH, G., & JMK, W. (2026). Gynecologic Surgeon Assessment of the Reprocessed Versus New LigaSure Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device in a Simulated Surgical Task: A Pilot Study.. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.044
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:18:04.180Z