Standalone lateral and oblique approaches vs traditional posterior approaches for adjacent segment disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283
- Published
- 2026-12
- Container
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283,
title = {Standalone lateral and oblique approaches vs traditional posterior approaches for adjacent segment disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis},
author = {Shashwat Shah and Esteban Quiceno and Mohamed A.R. Soliman and Isabelle G. Stockman and Hendrick B. Francois and Hannon W. Levy and Kyungduk Rho and Asham Khan and Jeffrey P. Mullin and John Pollina},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Neuroscience},
doi = {10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Standalone lateral and oblique approaches vs traditional posterior approaches for adjacent segment disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis AU - Shashwat Shah AU - Esteban Quiceno AU - Mohamed A.R. Soliman AU - Isabelle G. Stockman AU - Hendrick B. Francois AU - Hannon W. Levy AU - Kyungduk Rho AU - Asham Khan AU - Jeffrey P. Mullin AU - John Pollina PY - 2026 JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283 ER -
APA
Shah, S., Quiceno, E., Soliman, M. A., Stockman, I. G., Francois, H. B., Levy, H. W., Rho, K., Khan, A., Mullin, J. P., & Pollina, J. (2026). Standalone lateral and oblique approaches vs traditional posterior approaches for adjacent segment disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112283
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T11:48:04.601Z