Stand-alone cage versus cage–plate fixation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy: A retrospective comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes

Arnav P. Rathod, Chaitanya Chikhale, Rajendra Baitule, Ganesh Pundkar

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035
Published
08
Container
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035,
  title = {Stand-alone cage versus cage–plate fixation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy: A retrospective comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes},
  author = {Arnav P. Rathod and Chaitanya Chikhale and Rajendra Baitule and Ganesh Pundkar},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Orthopaedic Reports},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Stand-alone cage versus cage–plate fixation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy: A retrospective comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes
AU  - Arnav P. Rathod
AU  - Chaitanya Chikhale
AU  - Rajendra Baitule
AU  - Ganesh Pundkar
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035
ER  - 

APA

Rathod, A. P., Chikhale, C., Baitule, R., & Pundkar, G. (2026). Stand-alone cage versus cage–plate fixation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy: A retrospective comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2026.101035

Source records